Skip to main content

MAZENG-FT-46 · Trustworthy service health and history

Feature intent

Users need to distinguish a Maze service incident from a problem limited to their own project.

Why it matters

Users need to distinguish a Maze service incident from a problem limited to their own project.

Expected outcome

Users can make informed decisions from current, timestamped service health and accurate incident history.

In scope

  • Current status for every governed Maze service.
  • Accessible service history with explicit timestamps and incident semantics.
  • Explicit loading, empty, stale, and failure states.
Delivery status
IN_BACKLOG
Owner
RootAtSkic (product lead)
Parent Epic
MAZENG-EP-13
Solution approval
PENDING

Acceptance

Acceptance outcomes

  1. 01

    Public status shows a current state and timestamp for every governed service.

  2. 02

    Users can inspect an accurate 30-day history with accessible incident semantics and honest regional availability.

  3. 03

    Empty, stale, loading, and API-failure states are explicit.

Dependencies and risks

Dependencies

None recorded.

Risks

  • Reliable probes, retention, service inventory, timezone rules, and incident semantics are not yet defined.
  • Legacy retention covers about ten days despite presenting a 30-day history.
  • Legacy sorting and regional-status logic can present incorrect output and must not be preserved.

Authoritative Architecture tasks

No authoritative Architecture tasks are linked.

Original source