Reusable UI component authoring and review workbench
| Feature | Parent Epic | Delivery status | Status source | Owner | Approved for Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3DARCH-FT-4 | 3DARCH-EP-1 — Engineering Platform, Quality, and Operability | IN_BACKLOG | EXACT | 3D Architecture Wizzard team | No |
Description
Enable frontend developers and designers to create, demonstrate, accessibility-check, and test consistent interface components outside a product application.
User or operator problem
Designers and frontend developers need to review component behavior and accessibility without mounting a complete product application.
Expected value
Accelerates consistent component delivery and exposes interaction or accessibility defects earlier.
Scope
Includes component generation, package export, Storybook documentation, accessibility checks, and headless story interactions.
Exclusions
- End-user product behavior and solution or release authorization are outside these engineering Features.
Acceptance outcomes
- A generator creates a component, story, and package export in the chosen atomic category.
- Storybook presents component documentation and accessibility tooling.
- Story interactions can run in a headless browser.
- The component library builds behind a stable package entry point.
Dependencies
- 3DARCH-FT-1 — Reproducible monorepo development workspace
- 3DARCH-FT-2 — Shared contracts and reusable interface foundations
Risks
- Storybook, accessibility tooling, and browser interaction tests can drift from the shipped component package.
Human approval
Linas approved this Feature for documentation on 2026-09-02T10:40:43.220Z. It is not Approved for Solution and has no implementation approval.
Delivery status evidence
The Feature was separately registered at IN_BACKLOG as an accepted catalogue boundary. This records backlog retention, not design or delivery progress.
- Event: Catalogue registration
- Actor and authority: Linas — Human project team member
- Reason: The Feature catalogue was accepted for governed documentation and retained in the backlog.
- Status evidence
Architecture traceability
- Requirements: none derived.
- Readiness: Not started.
Architecture solution work must not begin until a separate human Approved for Solution decision is recorded.
Tasks
Review the Tasks group. No canonical implementation Tasks have been defined.
Original source
- Discord – Scope – Linas: original Feature request
- Discord – Scope – Linas: proceed with documented mapping
Legacy implementation evidence
The Feature boundary was mined from legacy revision c0ced47ecaf4426f47e5c2e4868677f7144b951a.