VSSA clients and systems registry

This site organizes public-source evidence around 290 authoritative Lithuanian public-sector clients and the digital systems, services, suppliers, and delivery relationships found during research.

Choose a starting point

If you need to…	Start here
Find an organization and inspect its evidence coverage	Client directory
Follow a named system or shared service across organizations	Systems registry
Follow a named contractor or provider across systems and clients	Contractors registry
Understand what can and cannot be inferred	Research methodology
Reuse or verify the underlying records	Data and provenance

Current client coverage

Status	Records	Meaning
Researched	79	Material publicly identifiable systems have been investigated and evidenced.
Partial	197	Useful evidence exists, but material questions remain unresolved.
No public evidence	14	No defensible systems claim was found in the reviewed public sources.
Pending	0	Investigation has not started.

Status describes public-evidence coverage, not the quality, security, or maturity of an organization's technology estate.

How the records connect

1. The client registry is the authoritative list of organizations.
2. Each client dossier records systems, services, contractors, relationships, direct sources, confidence, and unresolved gaps.
3. The generated systems registry consolidates only clearly identical labels and links every observation back to its client dossier.
4. The generated contractors registry preserves each named provider and its evidenced role across linked clients and systems.
5. Direct evidence remains the basis for every material claim; unknowns are kept explicit rather than inferred.

Interpret safely

A system-client link may mean ownership, use, operation, procurement, hosting, maintenance, support, or another evidenced relationship. Open the relevant dossier before treating an association as ownership or current use. Absence of public evidence is not evidence of absence.