Control an Aircraft Continuously
Overview
Accept continuous player input throughout free flight
User
An AeroSim player
What the user can do
Accept continuous player input throughout free flight
Why the user benefits
The player receives one coherent, observable capability.
User need
The player needs AeroSim to accept continuous player input throughout free flight.
In scope
Accept continuous player input throughout free flight
- StatusProposed
- OwnerAeroSim Scope (proposed; not accepted)
- Parent EpicAEROSIM-EP-4
- Depends onAEROSIM-FT-1, AEROSIM-FT-11
Tasks
AEROSIM-TS-3Planning status: DoneCapture continuous flight controls and control ownership
Supported pitch, roll, yaw, and thrust inputs produce normalized authoritative control commands, while input loss or ownership changes are surfaced without silently transferring control.
- ComponentWeb Application — browser input adapters and control-ownership state
- Depends onAEROSIM-TS-75, AEROSIM-TS-82
- RequirementsFR-0005, NFR-0006
AEROSIM-TS-96Planning status: DoneApply control commands through the responsive flight loop
Each valid authoritative control command affects subsequent aircraft motion continuously within the declared timing and resource budgets.
- ComponentWeb Application / Deterministic flight runtime — Shared flight-core — control-command application and simulation update loop
- Depends onAEROSIM-TS-3
- RequirementsFR-0006, NFR-0001, NFR-0003, NFR-0005, NFR-0010
Acceptance outcomes
- 01
Supported control inputs update the active aircraft continuously during free flight.
- 02
Loss or change of input is shown and handled without silently transferring control.
Functional requirements and measurable criteria
accept continuous controls
The system shall accept continuous pitch, roll, yaw, and thrust values during flight.
Acceptance 01
Givena valid current Feature configuration and defined initial state
Whenthe relevant user action or simulation step occurs
Thenthe observable result must accept continuous pitch, roll, yaw, and thrust values during flight
EvidenceFuture reviewed automated and browser evidence must verify this outcome against the current requirement.
Acceptance 02
Givenan invalid or unsupported input at the same boundary
Whenthe system evaluates the input
Thenthe system must reject or recover visibly without publishing a misleading result
EvidenceFuture negative-path tests and browser evidence must verify explicit failure or recovery behaviour.
apply control response
The system shall apply valid control changes to subsequent aircraft motion.
Acceptance 01
Givena valid current Feature configuration and defined initial state
Whenthe relevant user action or simulation step occurs
Thenthe observable result must apply valid control changes to subsequent aircraft motion
EvidenceFuture reviewed automated and browser evidence must verify this outcome against the current requirement.
Acceptance 02
Givenan invalid or unsupported input at the same boundary
Whenthe system evaluates the input
Thenthe system must reject or recover visibly without publishing a misleading result
EvidenceFuture negative-path tests and browser evidence must verify explicit failure or recovery behaviour.
Non-functional requirements
- NFR-0001 — Performance
Maintain responsive rendering and simulation.
- NFR-0003 — Responsiveness
Present control and state feedback within a measurable budget.
- NFR-0005 — Resource governance
Keep browser and deployed workload consumption within explicit budgets.
- NFR-0006 — Compatibility
Support the declared browser and input compatibility matrix.
- NFR-0010 — Responsive flight interaction
Supported input-to-state and state-to-render paths meet the declared latency budget across ordinary flight, bounded heavy scenes, pause, camera selection, outcomes, and recovery.
Risks
- Risk
Prototype behaviour may not meet the current acceptance outcomes.
Original source and prototype evidence
- discord: Authoritative clean-slate Scope recommendation.
- discord: Clean-slate Scope discussion 1.
- discord: Clean-slate Scope discussion 2.
- discord: Clean-slate Scope discussion 3.
- discord: Agreed eight-Epic portfolio and Feature decomposition.
- discord: Agreed eight-Epic portfolio and Feature decomposition continuation.
- discord: RootAtSkic directed publication of the agreed Scope update.
Prototype and discovery boundary
Existing application behaviour is discovery evidence only; it establishes no current Scope approval, implementation approval, acceptance, or release state.